Are errors eating into your capacity and profits? This question resonates with manufacturing leaders across North America.
Are errors eating into your capacity and profits? This question resonates with manufacturing leaders across North America who are grappling with an increasingly challenging production environment. Over the past two decades, we have had the unique opportunity to work with hundreds of factories producing high-tech products in industries ranging from defense, aerospace and medical devices to industrial electronics, heavy machines and precision laboratory instruments. A consistent theme has emerged: factory managers and executives are struggling to eliminate human errors in their manufacturing processes, while training has become a significant burden on their organizations.
Executives report the manufacturing workforce landscape has transformed dramatically. Training time for new workers has doubled over the past 20 years: What once took 3-6 months now requires 6-12 months. More critically, we hear that mechanical hand skills and technical aptitude of new manufacturing workers have declined substantially.
Where factories report they once could easily hire skilled millwrights, they now find themselves training people who lack the fundamental technical knowledge factories need.
Within the most advanced manufacturing organizations, interviewing five line workers how they complete a complex manual assembly process more often than not results in five different answers. This highlights a critical gap with experienced operators who may have developed their own version of the assembly process, but this knowledge is not well shared or known within the organization. The differences in technique or step sequences result in significant differences in overall assembly cycle time, quality of workmanship and ultimately means the company does not own the process knowledge, it’s only known by its experienced workers.
This knowledge and skills gap creates a cascade effect, as training responsibilities fall to supervisors and senior assembly workers, impacting overall productivity. Meanwhile, manufacturers report they compete for labor with gig-economy platforms offering flexible working arrangements, further complicating recruitment and retention.
When quality issues reach end customers, the damage extends far beyond immediate costs. The credibility hit of customers asking “how did you miss something so simple” is just the beginning. Our research reveals the true scope of warranty and customer satisfaction costs that include:
Critically, the example quality and training challenges are silently stealing factory capacity. With 20% to 50% of products requiring rework, facilities are losing a corresponding percentage of their potential throughput. In cases involving adhesives, epoxies, or other permanent bonding agents, simple assembly mistakes can result in complete product write off as rework is not economically viable. This pattern repeats across industries and regions, affecting any manufacturer producing complex, modern products.
The good news is that manufacturing leadership teams can take immediate, actionable steps to get their facilities back on track and win back lost profits and capacity. We use the following comprehensive approach to take a holistic perspective to the manufacturing process.
Understanding the source of errors is paramount and executives must determine whether issues are:
Manufacturing challenges often stem from design issues, but solutions must be practical and encompass:
Human-introduced mistakes often stem from systemic issues including:
Vendors over time can become complacent in the delivering of high-quality products to your organization. When making an assessment we start by looking at the following issues:
Training is an ongoing challenge for nearly every manufacturer we speak with and some of the following questions may unearth some critical truths that help in your quest:
All planned changes and solutions must align with enterprise quality management systems such as ISO 9001 or Industry-specific systems like such as IATF 16949 or AS9100. Any implemented solution must contain a method to track changes to ensure ongoing compliance and auditability within your quality management system.
Making changes to live production presents unique challenges but can be successfully managed through:
The most successful transformation programs optimize resource allocation by:
After quantifying root cause and measuring impacts, you are well positioned to identify the right solution or partner for your organization. New to industry, AI-powered manufacturing co-pilots have already demonstrated remarkable proven results with:
For more information about implementing solutions in your organization, contact Rapta, your transformational partner, to help you work through the next steps of your journey. We help manufacturers across the US achieve:
About the Author
Aaron Brown is the CEO and Co-Founder of Rapta, Inc. Prior to Rapta, Aaron led the first innovation team at Stanley Black and Decker to commercialize an applied AI product to drive increased productivity in jobsites. In a career spanning 22 years working at the intersection of Software, AI and industrial manufacturing, Aaron has deployed operational solutions for Fortune 500 businesses and SMEs. Aaron is passionate about building products that give our customers an unfair advantage in manufacturing and ensuring we own our future through sovereign manufacturing.
Read More
Jeff White, leader of Robinson+Cole’s Manufacturing Law and Aerospace Supply Chain teams, and one of the most respected voices in the manufacturing world today, discusses the implications of tariffs becoming a permanent fixture, supply chains under constant stress, and technology transforming how companies operate. Jeff works with clients around the globe helping them navigate market access, growth, and disruption. He shares candid insights on how manufacturers can adapt to workforce shifts, embrace innovation, and stay competitive in a rapidly changing landscape. 🎧 Tune in to learn how to not just survive—but thrive—in today’s era of disruption.