Industry’s Media Platform of Choice
Champion Your Brand in Front of Decision Makers and Extend Your Reach Get Featured in the SPOTLIGHT
Identifying the differences between International Traffic in Arms Regulations & Export Administration Regulations is key for compliance.
By Cormac Twomey, CTO at Envoy
Navigating compliance is a challenging endeavor for manufacturers, and it’s easy to see why. On average, the U.S. has enacted one new manufacturing-related law per week since 1981. This complexity extends to key regulations, including the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). These compliance standards aim to protect national security by regulating the export of items with potential military or strategic significance. For manufacturers across industries, compliance is non-negotiable, and with recent updates to ITAR and EAR, a solid understanding of these regulations, including the nuances that set them apart, is critical for success.
ITAR is a set of U.S. regulations that govern the export and import of defense-related services and technologies. Compliance requires the implementation of stringent access control measures and registration with the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) to ensure that ITAR data in the cloud is not accessed by foreign entities. If an organization deals with items on the United States Munitions List (USML), compliance is mandatory. Specific industries that must comply with ITAR include:
While EAR is also a set of U.S. government regulations, it focuses on guidelines around the export and re-export of commercial and dual-use items with both commercial and potential military applications. EAR aims to ensure that the goods in these classifications do not compromise national security or foreign policy interests. The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) administers these regulations for the following industries:
ITAR and EAR both aim to protect national security by regulating the export of items with strategic or military significance, and these regulations are pivotal for organizations working in the above areas. However, ITAR and EAR also differ in a variety of ways:
Regulatory bodies and licensing requirements.
Types of items.
Classification systems.
Fines and penalties.
Compliance management is not a cut-and-dry process, and it requires innovative solutions—like a visitor management system (VMS)—to ensure the necessary regulatory requirements are met. These systems help ensure compliance by cross-checking visitor information against restricted lists. If individuals are known risks or have previously violated export controls, a VMS can ensure that they are denied entry. ITAR, for example, prohibits access to foreign nationals unless they have been specifically authorized.
Visitor management systems can also streamline the check-in process, gather necessary guest information, and manage legal documentation, such as non-disclosure agreements. As a result, organizations can easily create an auditable trail of visitor activity (another regulatory requirement).
For manufacturers, maintaining compliance with ITAR and EAR is about more than just understanding how they differ. It’s also about instituting the security measures and visitor policies that ensure organizations avoid violations and the headaches they produce. The right visitor management solution can help with that.
Cormac is the Chief Technology Officer at Envoy with over 25 years of experience in software engineering and architecture. His passion is to invest in product development teams and empower them to achieve accelerated velocity and quality for the organization.
Patti Jo Rosenthal chats about her role as Manager of K-12 STEM Education Programs at ASME where she drives nationally scaled STEM education initiatives, building pathways that foster equitable access to engineering education assets and fosters curiosity vital to “thinking like an engineer.”