January 9, 2026 Talent Challenges Industrial Employers Face Today

An insider look at why industrial employers face talent shortages—and what’s needed to recruit and retain today’s workforce.

By Lina Triesch, HR & Recruiting Consultant, Bright Box HR & Recruiting

For some time now, I have observed a concerning and growing pattern across industrial settings such as recycling, construction, manufacturing, and other sectors that depend year-round on blue-collar labor. These are roles that require physical effort—laborers, warehouse employees, equipment operators, and others who work with their hands, sweat through long summers, and endure cold or demanding conditions during winter months.

Historically, these positions were easier to fill. Roughly ten to fifteen years ago, industrial employers could rely on a steady and healthy flow of applications for these roles. Hiring teams could review multiple candidates, be selective, and build their workforce from a relatively large talent pool. Attendance, performance, and discipline were often emphasized as non-negotiable expectations, and employers generally held the upper hand in the hiring process. Over time, that dynamic has shifted.

As the volume of applicants declined, employers began struggling to find the same quantity of candidates to choose from. As labor became harder to source, organizations were forced to rethink long-standing hiring and retention practices. The balance of power gradually shifted toward the applicant, giving workers more leverage in wage negotiations. In many cases, companies had no choice but to increase wages year after year simply to remain competitive. What was once a 25- to 50-cent annual raise became $1, $2, or even $5 per hour increases, depending on the situation. To offset these rising labor costs, industrial organizations often had to cut expenses in other areas.

I am not an economist, but from an HR and operational perspective, the impact has been undeniable. Human resources teams across industrial sectors face this challenge daily, even as demand for industrial labor continues without slowing. I vividly remember one of the first moments this shift became real to me: an employee requesting a raise after seeing a fast-food restaurant across the street advertising higher hourly wages than we were not able to offer at the time. That moment was a turning point.

Shortly after, I began noticing fewer younger applicants entering industrial roles. This was not an isolated observation—it became a common theme in conversations with colleagues and industry leaders. There was a growing consensus that younger generations were simply less interested in physically demanding work. Technology careers, many of which require less than a four-year degree, offered higher starting wages, faster entry, and cleaner working environments. With a certificate or short-term training, young professionals could enter the workforce earning salaries in the $50,000 to $60,000 range.

Then COVID-19 accelerated everything, particularly when the idea of working from home became widely adopted.

Remote work became normalized, and many workers experienced an entirely new level of flexibility and work-life balance. At the same time, the cost of living increased significantly, adding further pressure on wages. For many, the idea of returning to physically demanding, on-site work became less attractive when compared to remote or hybrid alternatives. These combined factors created a widening gap in the industrial workforce: a smaller talent pool, higher pay expectations, employees covering multiple roles, and a declining interest in trade-based careers.

As a result, industrial employers are no longer competing only within their own industries. They are now competing with logistics companies, warehouses, retail, construction firms, and even service-sector employers for the same limited pool of workers. In this environment, retention becomes just as critical as recruitment—if not more so.

From my experience, successful retention in the industrial sector comes down to three core areas: company culture, competitive compensation, and meaningful benefits. While these may sound like obvious fundamentals, non-monetary rewards and workplace culture were not emphasized in the same way they are in today’s workforce environment.

Employers have also had to expand how and where they recruit. Talent acquisition strategies now include partnerships with trade institutes, halfway houses, recovery and sober-living programs, city staffing events, radio announcements, and broader use of platforms such as Indeed and even Craigslist. While these channels often require patience—and many candidates may not be the right fit—employers are often surprised by the quality of talent they discover when they are willing to teach skills and give people an opportunity to prove themselves.

One strategy that proved effective was investing in internal training programs for employees willing to learn new skills. When talent was no longer readily available externally—or when it became unaffordable—we had to create it internally. Cross-training employees helped address scheduling gaps and operational bottlenecks while giving workers a sense of growth and value. Partnering with trade schools and workforce education centers allowed us to bring in entry-level talent and develop them over time. In addition, competitive benefit packages—beyond wages alone—became essential, including flexibility that allowed employees to better balance work and personal life.

In many organizations, simple but intentional efforts—such as team meals, barbecues, breakfast tacos, or food trucks—have helped reduce tension and create moments of connection in physically demanding environments. These gestures may seem small, but they reinforce a sense of belonging.

At the core of retention is trust. Employees are more likely to stay when they feel their workplace is fair, consistent, and respectful—where expectations are clear, leadership is compassionate, and effort is recognized. Performance still matters, but retention requires a delicate balance between operational demands and recognizing employees as human beings with real lives, personal responsibilities, and limits.

Employees who receive in-house training and development opportunities often stay longer because they see a future within the organization. They recognize that they are learning, growing, and advancing under leadership that believes in them. These opportunities are not always available elsewhere, especially in industrial settings, and they create loyalty that compensation alone cannot buy.

For leaders in the industrial sector, the message is clear: identify your talent, invest in it, and be willing to adapt. Retention strategies must evolve, and outdated systems that no longer align with today’s workforce expectations must be reconsidered.

In addition, employers and industry leaders must speak up—to city councils, chambers of commerce, workforce boards, and policymakers—to raise awareness of the challenges facing the industrial labor market. While there is significant emphasis on technology and artificial intelligence careers, many essential roles cannot be replaced by AI anytime soon. Trades such as welding, machine operation, HVAC, electrical work, and other industrial careers must remain visible, valued, and supported if we want to sustain a healthy and resilient industrial workforce in the years ahead.

Subscribe to Industry Today