The Hidden Key to Driving Cost Savings and Innovation - Industry Today - Leader in Manufacturing & Industry News
 

September 22, 2023 The Hidden Key to Driving Cost Savings and Innovation

Manufacturers can embrace key optimization strategies to maximize investments and unlock innovation in critical areas within their business.

Let’s face it, back-office software is not the most thrilling topic, but in today’s highly competitive manufacturing world, it’s critical, as operational efficiency can make or break a business. However, implementing ERP systems entails significant initial expenses, including software, hardware and services implementation. Ongoing updates and maintenance add to recurring costs, while customizations for unique manufacturing processes can become very costly.

The reality for many organizations is that the high ERP costs can hamper innovation, as funds get tied up, delaying digital transformation. By embracing key ERP optimization strategies, including choosing the right people, processes and technologies, companies can thrive in a dynamic business landscape, achieving cost optimization, innovation and overall business success.

Key ERP challenges manufacturing leaders face

As the manufacturing business evolves, it faces a myriad of ERP challenges, some of which include costs and systems complexities. When it comes to cost complexities, initial expenses when implementing an ERP system are usually very high. This includes costs from the usual software and hardware to the professional services for implementation. Requirements for regular updates and maintenance and eventually upgrading to the latest version are also part of the equation, all of which can often be as expensive as the original implementation.

In many ways, initial investments can limit a company’s capacity for innovation. For example, funds that could be invested in new technologies or new controls to stay compliant, are instead tied up in unnecessary practices. Areas like data analytics and automation often fall behind. For instance, a company may find itself stuck using outdated data analytics tools because the cost of integrating new, more sophisticated ones within its ERP system is cost-prohibitive. Similarly, they may be unable to automate processes as effectively, due to high integration or customization costs.

When we talk about system complexities, ERP systems often need to integrate with other systems like CRM, supply chain management or specialized production equipment. However, the process can be time-consuming and require specialized knowledge, especially when dealing with legacy systems and newer technology.

In the manufacturing industry, organizations often have unique processes that ERP systems cannot handle without customization. These customizations can impact implementation and will be harder to maintain, especially when upgrades are required and companies need to re-customize their original system.   

Cost Optimization Strategies for ERP Systems:

There are a few strategies that can support business cost optimization. Bringing together the right systems, processes and people supports the overall business bottom line.

  • Choose the right system: Understanding the requirements before starting the selection process will help to choose a more suitable fit for an enterprise. For example, while customization can make the ERP system a better fit for businesses’ specific needs, it can also add significantly to the initial cost and the ongoing maintenance costs. Instead, manufacturing leaders can adopt appropriate processes to fit the ERP system where possible. This approach could reduce initial and ongoing maintenance costs.
  • Choose the right process: To enhance the cost-effectiveness of an ERP system, the right processes are paramount. This entails regularly reevaluating requirements and assessing the system’s features to avoid unnecessary expenditure on unused functionalities. As an example, companies can consider downgrading to a more cost-effective package and eliminating “shelfware,” streamlining operations by consolidating multiple systems serving similar purposes, especially those stemming from shadow IT or acquisitions.

    Another option is to assess the advantages of on-premise and cloud-based ERP solutions; while cloud-based options can lower upfront hardware and maintenance costs, offer flexibility and support scalability, on-premise ERP systems may yield lower long-term total ownership costs.
  • Choose the right people: Successful ERP implementations require proper project management. Having experienced knowledgeable professionals and adhering to best practices will prevent budget overruns and ensure a smooth process. Additionally, by providing comprehensive training for employees, businesses can enhance system utilization and understanding while minimizing costly errors and rework.

    Finding the right people may also entail outsourcing support, instead of maintaining an in-house IT staff. Outsourcing or co-sourcing enterprise support to specialized companies can reap as many benefits, if not more, than hiring full staff members.

Through efficient ERP cost management, companies can unlock resources for innovation, spanning research and development for new and enhanced products, along with investments in customer-centric technologies. They can also redirect funds to bolster workforce vitality by increasing employee retention.

Strengthening ERP systems for manufacturing leaders boosts agility, accelerates innovation and enhances efficiency for a competitive edge.
Strengthening ERP systems for manufacturing leaders boosts agility, accelerates innovation and enhances efficiency for a competitive edge.

Optimizing for Innovation

Optimizing ERP costs is a critical part of the broader landscape of digital transformation. Organizations must reduce operational costs that will free up resources that can be reinvested in innovative technologies and solutions. This becomes a competitive advantage, enabling quicker adoption of new technologies and business models.  

By strengthening ERP systems to match their unique needs, manufacturing leaders can become more agile and flexible. This can enable faster decision-making and improved efficiencies across the organizations, both of which are key factors in maintaining a competitive edge in today’s fast-paced business world.

steven salaets rimini street
Steven Salaets

About the Author:
Steven Salaets is the CIO & Executive Vice President Global Security, Quality and Internal Audit at Rimini Street, a global provider of enterprise software support products and services, and the leading third-party support provider for Oracle and SAP software products. 

As an innovative and forward-thinking senior executive with 20+ years of experience in Information Security, Compliance, Information Technology he is responsible for the overall leadership, strategic direction and execution of the Global IT Department as well as the Global Security, Quality and Internal Audit Departments. 

Prior to joining Rimini Street Mr. Salaets held various management positions at Moody’s KMV and Wind River — leading global standardization and integration projects, managing global teams across APAC, EMEA and the USA, defining enterprise architectural solutions and running global IT and security offices across the globe. 

Mr. Salaets is a recognized leader in the security industry and has received several personal industry recognitions, including: Information Security Executive People’s Choice Award Winner and Information Security Executive of the Decade Finalist. 

Mr. Salaets received his Bachelor of Science degree in computer science from Groep-T, Leuven, Belgium.

 

Subscribe to Industry Today

Read Our Current Issue

ASME & Discovery Education: STEM Programs Prepare Future Workforce

Most Recent EpisodeASME: Driving STEM Education Initiatives

Listen Now

Patti Jo Rosenthal chats about her role as Manager of K-12 STEM Education Programs at ASME where she drives nationally scaled STEM education initiatives, building pathways that foster equitable access to engineering education assets and fosters curiosity vital to “thinking like an engineer.”