By Jenine Bogrand, manufacturing leader of LaborWise, Deloitte Consulting LLP
February’s ISM Index for manufacturing jumped to 60.8 in February, continuing its 18-month growth streak. Employment alone increased by 5.5 points. But with chronic labor overspend in the industry, this begs the question: Was the employment bump necessary? The short answer is not necessarily: A lot of the demand for more workers comes from inadequate scheduling for hourly manufacturing employees.
Most manufacturers have three primary goals: Increasing quality, enhancing efficiencies, and improving worker productivity. One area that is often overlooked but can help achieve these goals is scheduling. It sounds simple, yet a deeper look into the process can highlight where scheduling can affect each of the three goals.
Historically, scheduling across plants was relatively basic, there were three shifts – first, second, and third. Employees were scheduled on an excel spreadsheet and it was posted on a wall. To assign a worker to a schedule, many plants used a manual bidding process that is based on skills, certification, and seniority. With input from the plant scheduler, who understood the production planning, the worker schedule was created and modified based on exceptions. Overall, a very tedious and manual process.
Now, plant scheduling is becoming more complex with varied shifts that, while improving metrics, can adversely affect employees as well as productivity if not managed properly. For example, think of a production line that is dependent on a specific skill set and one of the workers calls in sick. There can be multiple effects on the entire production line from missing that one person, such as:
All of these will affect the ability to achieve the goals of quality, efficiency, and productivity.
Poorly managed schedules will also result in employee burnout, impacting the bottom line. In the example above, the supervisor most likely called in a worker who was on a scheduled day off. Or, they may have asked workers from the shift either before or after to stay or come in early. In both instances, the worker may not be able to have enough rest time causing him or her to be tired, which can have the downstream effect on compromised safety, reduced productivity, lack of focus, and increased frustration.
The challenge is how to manage the schedules effectively and reduce the effects of unexpected changes. To help alleviate some that risk, there are tools and processes that are now available to manage even the most complex scheduling scenarios. The leading workforce management applications all have scheduling modules that address seniority, fatigue factors, and skill requirements. While the retail, healthcare, and transportation sectors have all embraced more advanced scheduling tools, the manufacturing world has been slow to do so and is now starting to realize the potential it brings in better managing their workforce.
For example, a worker calls in sick. Below are the steps that would take place with automated scheduling once the worker has notified a supervisor. The result? Far less negative impact on a company’s bottom line.
— Required skill or certification
— Seniority
— Required rest parameters
How did this help with the goals of productivity, efficiencies and quality?
While this was an example of dealing with an exception, there are benefits of using an application in the normal day-to-day scheduling process.
A scheduling tool can be the difference between having a full-staffed team or needing to hire. It helps optimize schedules by looking at certain types of data, then creating a schedule that is based on the peaks and valleys of the production line as well as the skills needed to staff that line. As with the exception process, the automation will also look at times allocated for potential fatigue, safety meetings, clean up, donning/doffing, and other activities that may affect the overall schedule, but will deliver a holistic schedule for the various areas within the plant. A plant scheduler can then work with the management team to fine tune the delivered schedules based on potential line exceptions without manually creating the schedules in excel or a printed matrix. The end result is happier, more productive employees, benefitting the staff and the bottom line of the company.
About the Author
Jenine Bogrand is a Manufacturing Sector Leader for LaborWise, Deloitte Consulting LLP. With over 30 years of HR experience, she now works with large enterprise companies to develop HR strategies that will benefit their employees and create efficiencies in all areas of their operations.
Tune in to hear from Chris Brown, Vice President of Sales at CADDi, a leading manufacturing solutions provider. We delve into Chris’ role of expanding the reach of CADDi Drawer which uses advanced AI to centralize and analyze essential production data to help manufacturers improve efficiency and quality.