By Naveen Poonian, Vice President of Strategy for iBASEt
Look no further than the serious issues with Samsung’s Galaxy Note 7, which has fallen into the media spotlight over reports that the product is a fire hazard. The phone-maker has reportedly changed battery suppliers since then, but the cause still remains somewhat of a mystery.
Quality is increasingly challenged by a volatile business environment including rapidly changing global markets, the emergence of disruptive technologies, new and often daunting regulations, and the impact of social media. Aging quality management practices, in particular, have struggled mightily to keep pace with the accelerating level of change, largely due to underinvestment at the corporate level.
During a widespread recall, the sophistication of a company’s manufacturing systems will determine how quickly a cause can be identified and the actions that need to be taken in the short-term to guarantee consumer safety and begin rebuilding trust with the general public. Such a system is a strategic investment that not only helps streamline operations but also prevents against quality issues as global supply chain grow increasingly more complex. This gives executives much-needed insights into manufacturing and supply chain operations to convey a sense of transparency and control over the business and the product.
Notably, LNS Research recently released an e-book that builds the executive business case for Enterprise Quality Management Systems (EQMS). “Quality Management in the Boardroom” is important new research for any organization looking to better its quality management processes.
The report notes, “Top executives often do not see as much strategic value in quality management as in sales, engineering, or manufacturing. As a consequence, in many organizations quality is a silo and perceived as the quality police.”
This attitude is antithetical to how quality works when done correctly, specifically as a process that extends across the enterprise and provides value across all functions. LNS sees the current situation as something of a “Catch-22”: quality must break out of its silo to realize its potential, but its lack of perceived value makes it difficult for it to garner support from top executives and enterprise leaders:
[scode sid=’7457′]
Support from top executives plays a crucial role in the long-term effectiveness of quality, far beyond project funding. Long-term executive sponsorship results in top-down support, executive voice, and sustained resources, which are the three elements that quality needs to thrive.
To gain executive support, quality leaders typically need a compelling event, which LNS defines as “a business influence or pressure that forces action or response, with a defined date and business owner.” Unfortunately, most compelling events are negative (e.g., recalls, regulatory failure) and damaging to the company, its employees, and the public. What is needed is a positive compelling event to elicit executive sponsorship, one that can be controlled and driven by quality. LNS sees this compelling event as the executive business case, “connected to either existing strategic objectives or new strategic objectives such as the Internet of Things (IoT).”
Based on data from the LNS Research Quality Management Survey (completed by more than 700 executives and other senior leaders from a variety of company sizes and geographies across a range of industries), the report makes six actionable recommendations to improve the maturity of quality management, making it more responsive to the pace of change that marks today’s business:
Naveen Poonian is Vice President of Strategy for iBASEt. He is responsible for aligning organizational and departmental objectives with the company’s vision and mission statement through the implementation of strategic initiatives that result in greater organizational efficiency, rapid growth, and scalability.
Patti Jo Rosenthal chats about her role as Manager of K-12 STEM Education Programs at ASME where she drives nationally scaled STEM education initiatives, building pathways that foster equitable access to engineering education assets and fosters curiosity vital to “thinking like an engineer.”